The Contraception Debate

As a physician who provides birth control counseling to women, I feel that we (physicians) need to speak out louder about the current argument before the Supreme Court. My own life serves as an example to how well birth control has benefitted my career. My husband and I were married for 6 years before our first child was born, planned near the end of my residency. During medical school, we did not have insurance that provided for birth control so we relied on the services of Planned Parenthood for birth control pills. Providing contraception still remains the primary service of Planned Parenthood. Child #2 and #3 were equally planned, using various forms of contraception between each pregnancy. Since 40% of pregnancies in the US are unplanned, I was fortunate to not only have access to birth control but to also be able to afford it. Many women have not been so lucky. This is why the Affordable Care Act, as it pertains to contraception, is so important and needs to be universal. Women should not have to worry about who they work for, how much money they have left at the end of the month, or what their religion dictates. If they need to use birth control for either contraception or medical reasons, it should be a discussion between a woman and her medical provider.

During my medical career I have seen a woman die from post-partum hemorrhage, leaving her newborn infant and other two children motherless. There were simple medical resources available to save her life, but because she was a Jehovah’s Witness she refused a blood transfusion. Another woman refused a life saving cesarean delivery for her infant due to her religious beliefs, and delivered a stillborn infant. Both times the decisions these women and their families made was against my medical training. But I was powerless to intervene as they had the right to exercise their religious beliefs. The owners of Hobby Lobby also have the right to exercise their religious beliefs in regards to their own immediate family. They do not have the right to extend their religious beliefs to their employees when it comes to what type of health care benefits their employees can choose. Jehovah’s Witness employers do not have the right to decline any type of blood product for their employees. Christian Scientist employers cannot refuse to provide traditional western medical treatment.

This country was founded on the seperation of church and state. How does it seem that we are going backwards when it comes to minority religious groups dictating what is best for the rest of the country. Since the overwhelming majority of adult Americans have used some form of birth control, why are we not becoming more vocal in our opposition? Contraception makes sense from a financial, economic and health viewpoint. In fact, a recent study demonstrated that there are more benefits than drawbacks from providing birth control pills over the counter. I hope that the Supreme Court will use the interests of the majority of Americans when they make their final decision.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s